Interview questions that spell danger.....
When you apply for a job you fill out a form or maybe
prepare a CV, you do a covering letter
or sometimes a longer ‘supporting statement’. You send it off and if
you’ve been persuasive enough on paper you get to an interview. So you set off
in best suit and shiny shoes and someone; maybe an employer or maybe a
recruitment consultant sits you down and says:
So give me a quick trot through your career... or tell me
about your career, or give us an overview of your career, what have your career
highs and lows been.
And this is a dangerous question because your answer can say
more about you than you realise.
Now the sharp and alert candidate may just be tempted to say
‘you’ve got my Cv, need i say more?’ But interviews are very disempowering
to individuals (all the power seems to
be on that other side of the desk) and I’ve rarely come across someone who
responded in that fashion.
But why do the interviewers ask that? May be they have not
read the paperwork. It does happen that the person who screens the applications
is different from the one that is interviewing.
I did once go to see a recruitment agency/consultancy and discovered
that actually they had not read the Cv properly and seemed to have started
reading at page 2 and thought I was working in a job I’d left 10 years
before! So help them out with a précis.
The way you answer can, just as your CV and letter does,
reveal a lot about you that you may not have intended to reveal. My heart
always sinks when a candidate starts with job number one and then takes me
through their life history brick by brick. Dry, tedious and full of information
that i already have infront of me. (and I do read the paperwork) It often takes
forever. So top tip number one, clarify with the interviewer if you can, is
this a bio-data interview or a warm up question. And the best way to do this maybe to ask
‘where would you like me to start?’ If they say at the beginning it is more
likely to be the former and then they
will be looking for a detailed analysis of what you did where, what you
achieved and why you changed jobs. If it is a bio-data interview the
interviewer should be probing and prompting, giving you a steer about the sort
of detail they want. If the latter they
will be listening to what you select to mention and include.
So what can emerge from ‘the trot through the career ?
patterns about why you moved on;
·
repeatedly being made redundant (smokescreen for sacked?),
·
deciding to leave because of differences of
policy, (awkward customer does not get on with people?),
·
looking for ‘new challenges’ when the moves have
been between similar jobs (low boredom threshold?)
·
moving around very quickly for more money (no
loyalty)
·
staying a long time in jobs (lacks appetite and
drive)
There are numerous permutations and not all of those are
negative indications. A thirst for variety is no bad thing in a job that offers
considerable variety or an organisation that does not expect people to stay
long.
But you also reveal how you look at the world. If you take a
linear approach and describe each job
etc you are suggesting that that is your approach to life. It’s linear, it’s
detailed, it’s prosaic. If you give chapter and verse on every employment when
not specifically asked for it, you really do risk boring the interviewer to
death!
So if you are grey hair/no hair, going for a senior role and
someone asks that question, what is it that they really want to know?
Well they may be trying to understand your career drivers or
motivators, what is it that makes you tick ? are you the sort of person they
want on board? Do your motivators align with their values.
They may be looking to see if you can helicopter and
identify themes and patterns. Well of course you can and you can ensure that
they are the ones you want them to hear about!
If they are looking for someone with strategic thinking
ability, give them a strategic answer.
Most interviewers have read your cv and don’t want to hear
it all again they want to hear more and different so think about what you want
them to hear.
The danger is that you take the interviewer too literally
and ‘trot’ them through your career until all they want to do is put you out to
grass. Take a thematic approach and you can be enthusiastic and energetic,
succinct and enlightening whilst retaining their interest. If they want to
probe they can do so but please, what ever you do: be interesting!
No comments:
Post a Comment